Calls for marijuana legalization

The debate on whether or non to legalize quite a littlenabis trade and consumption has been ranging on for a gigantic time with c tout ensembles for its total push throughlaw as as loud as those that fight for its legalization. This debate a quantify takes a religious and an emotional perspective. This stem seeks to streng wherefore with factual support, the c only ifs that support its legalization. It allow for give reasons behind those views as rise up as analyze the opposing sentiments. all(prenominal) this is in the weigh that ganja, if legalized, stands to be much beneficial to the society that the way it is today.My prime(prenominal) production line towards legalization of hemp go out take an economic perspective. Billions of tax remunerators money is going to tout in the process of arresting and prosecuting race acc utilise of go by bathroomnabis. This money should be channeled towards early(a)wise important purposes like health c be and providi ng education to our children (Barnett P.G 166-171).Every year in America, thousands of pile ar huddled in medicate courts faced with all manner of charges ranging from consuming to trafficking hemp, then handed undeserving sentences. litigate requires millions of dollars. This is money that should be spent in giving counseling and treatment to the bear upon rather than trying to catch the few of the majority that smokes. It is app arnt that our money is certainly going to ache the war against drugs has neer been won and is not going to be won any(prenominal) time soon.The approach of maintaining prisoners arraigned in court over ganja related to cases each year is estimated at 1.2 billion dollars ever year. This does not hold the cost of investigating, arresting, a prosecuting and hundreds of thousands of hemp summation abusers arrested every year (Wayne Hall 7) this to me is a waste of scarce resources, money that otherwise should not be utilise had we legalized ma rijuana.Still in economics, the marijuana is a multibillion industry that continues to place pabulum on the t equal to(p) for millions of pile foundation wide, feloniously of course. I this industry can operate legally it would be able to secure jobs to millions much as come up as contri howevering billion of dollars through taxation. About 11 billion dollars would be gained from the tax. (Douglas Mc Ray58). The marketing of marijuana has its black-market function is left to black marketers this inwardness that soon their proceeds go untaxed.Economic benefits of legalized marijuana volition be two fold. beginning it will be from the funds saved from the efforts to suppress and eradicate its use and then secondly benefits arising form its taxation. hemp should be legalized, either way whether legalized or illegal consumption noneffervescent takes place. There ar no statistics available to depict that its proceed legal suppression over perchance the last 30 years has had any consequent impact. prohibition does not sub expression its use. Its popularity does not wane. Netherlands has done it. Its a good case study that marijuana legalization would not be the misfortune that opponents say it would be (Douglas Mc Kay29-32)Debate still rages on possible effects of legalizing marijuana on the health of the users. There ar those who argue that it has adverse effects on health while others argue that the boilers suit effects argon insignificant. Without looking at the worst case scenarios and moderation cases, two studies indicate that there are no cognize risks associated with its overdose possible case effects can only be exhibited in the behaviors of the user. (Douglas Mc Kay) these results indicate that marijuana use is not to a greater extent insecure than alcohol consumption unlimitedly.Tobacco use is equally harmful and yet it is legal. The reason wherefore marijuana remains illegal is collect to its peeved adverse effects on the us ers. The presidential term in its social function role has to limit its use/abuse. This to me is base on flimsy grounds. Alcohol and baccy are also harmful, then wherefore ban one poison and out proper(a)ly allow the use of goods and services of the other one. This is illegal.marihuana decriminalization will allow people to explore the possible medicinal set it has. Studies take shown, according to Baker D.(2003 561-567),that cannnabinoids (contained in marijuana) provide a novel cure target, not only for controlling symptoms, but also slowing disease development through inhibition of neurodeneration. Disregarding its side effects, marijuana is hailed to have many remedy benefits like subsiding pain in the ass in the neck in cancer patients it is underlyingally used with pain and muscle stiffness in patients.Criminalization of marijuana literally closes these windows of research. Doctors and health experts are forbid from researching with it or administering on any o f their patients disdain indications that it can effectively be used for medical purpose with only more or less mile side effects. We are reservation it inaccessible to millions of people out there who are mayhap suffering form cancer and would want approximately relieve.This bucolic boasts of respect and exercising fundamental freedoms for all persons. Freedom of worship is a mention discipline that should be exercised by all and is guaranteed by the constitution. Rastafaricinism, a dominant organized religion in Jamaica openly advocates for marijuana usage citing its religious importance. Criminalization of marijuana understandably is in contravention of people right not only to exercise their right of worship but also their basic right to choice as long these choices do not affect others negatively.I believe it should be left to the respective individuals to befuddle an informed choice on whether suffer or not. They should be left alone to exercise the individual liberty . People to, are left alone to choose on whether to drink or smoke, despite their cognise harms, people as nearly, I think should be given leeway over marijuana.As I had noted earlier, the proponents of marijuana criminalization are equally vocal and belief they have solid reasons as to why the spot quo should remain. Marijuana just like just about drug is known to induce habit-forming escapeencies, this is where its continued use results to the user being hooked to it to an extent that they are unable to function normally without it. I must say however, that addiction is not limited to marijuana alone alcohol, tobacco and also other prescribed drugs are known to cause addddiction even of a higher degree than hangmans halter.There is also the principle that it legalization is tantamount to sending a message especialy to underage that its consumption is therefore good. It will remove the stigma currently associated with it making it attracitve to most persons. Although this po int contains some truth in it, legalization of ganja in Netherlands failed to indicate this. Although there were a few new users, occassioned by its decriminalization, their rime were not significantly high to justify any concerns.Initial lifting of the ban would see maybe attraction of new users but this would posterior change as Clement k(1999,p49) says,..on the other hand,the disappearance of the forbidden fruits characteristics of marijuana would tend to lower consumption.This waters down the argument that lifting the ban would see increased use.Marijuana in any case if allowed will lead to more expenses on the government to recognise with its abuse. There will be increased allocations for the rehabs and medical facilities tao cope with its possible rampant usage. It would also loaded more investments to cope with drug related crimes resulting from drug abuse. I must asseverate however, that findings doen do not ling marijuana to any violent crimes more than they do othe r drugs or specifically to alcohol. Also, a simple lsot benefit analysis refutes that the government stands to spend more on rehabs. By legalising it, any additional investment on rehabs is surpassed by the savings on marijuana policies and prosecutions in additional to the likely benefits emanating from taxes. (Aldrich, M. et al, 75-81).ConclusionThere is a need to review the current laws illegalise marijuana use in total.It is more beneficial to the general society and specially the government.The benefits gained through taxation and employment installation surpasses the negative effects of rehabilitating the abusers.In addition too are the millions of dollars the federal government would save.The resources used to fight marijuana through prosecutions,arrests and maintaining thousands in jail would be rechanelled to other zippy sectors.The benefits outweigh the costs,this should be the sole system of logic behind its legalisation.More benefits too stand to be reaped through t he possible advances made in the medicine sector.It will see more research being done to ramp up ways in which marijuana can be used to ease pain in cancer patients as well as other medicinal value being explored.Works CitedAidriach, M. and T. uikuriya. Savings in Carlifornia Marijuana law enforcement costsattributable to the Moscone Act of 1976. Journal of mind-bending drugs 20, 1998.75-81. Appraisals of the adverse health effects of cannabis use Ideology andEvidence. June 1999.The FAS Drug form _or_ system of government Analysis Bulletin. Washington DC. Accessed on tertiary August 2007.https//fas.org/3Baker D. Pryce G. The therapeutic Potential of cannabis in multiple sclerosis. Expertopinion on investigations drugs. 2003, 561-567.Barnett, P.G. The cost-effectiveness of substance abuse treatment. Current psychiatryreports. 1999. 166-171.Thornton, M. Prohibition US. Legalisation Do Economists reach a conclusion of drugpolicy? Ludwig Von Mises form 2002. pp.27Marijuana Legalisa tion the time is now. 1998. The psycheditic Library al-Qaida page.Clement K W Daryal M. The Economics of Marijuana Consumption.Crawley, Australia University of Western Australia Economic Research center.1999, p 49.indicate that marijuana resutls aviors of the user. ases, both studies indicate that there are no known risks associated with it